<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Philip Flint &#187; Security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://philipflint.com/category/it/security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://philipflint.com</link>
	<description>www.philipflint.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:41:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Are you a Control Freak or a Freedom Fighter ?</title>
		<link>http://philipflint.com/2010/11/03/are-you-an-it-control-freak-or-a-freedom-fighter/</link>
		<comments>http://philipflint.com/2010/11/03/are-you-an-it-control-freak-or-a-freedom-fighter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 22:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philip Flint</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philipflint.com/?p=774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I speak with a lot of people who work in IT run departments. Some of them even run the department. What I&#8217;ve noticed is that people involved in IT tend to fall into two distinct groups which can be labelled &#8220;Control Freaks&#8221; and &#8220;Freedom Fighters&#8221;. These guys are easy to distinguish between. A typical conversation [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I speak with a lot of people who work in IT run departments. Some of them even run the department. What I&#8217;ve noticed is that people involved in IT tend to fall into two distinct groups which can be labelled &#8220;Control Freaks&#8221; and &#8220;Freedom Fighters&#8221;. These guys are easy to distinguish between.</p>
<p>A typical conversation with a Control Freak will go something like this:</p>
<p><em><span style="color: #3366ff;">Me: Tell me, what are you hoping to get from this solution ?</span></em></p>
<p><em><span style="color: #3366ff;">Client: We need to <strong>stop</strong> our users from doing this, we have to <strong>prevent</strong> them from accessing that data and <strong>stop</strong> them from sending it out. They <strong>shouldn&#8217;t</strong> get to this site and we <strong>don&#8217;t want</strong> them able to do this.</span></em></p>
<p>By contrast a conversation with a Freedom Fighter will sound more like the following.</p>
<p><span style="color: #3366ff;"><em>Me: Tell me, what are you hoping to get from this solution ?</em></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #3366ff;"><em>Client: We need our users to <strong>be able</strong> to do what they have to do, we need to <strong>allow</strong> them to access data and <strong>let </strong>them to send it out. They <strong>should</strong> be able to get to web sites when they need to and we <strong>want</strong> them to able to do whatever it takes to succeed.</em></span></p>
<p>As you can see, the first example is a legacy view of IT about prevention and locking down of systems. The second has IT as an enabler to the business, allowing people to work whilst keeping the business secure. In truth achieving the correct result can be a fine balancing act between the two. If you lock down systems too much then clearly users will either try and work around your security (not good) or the best of the bunch will not want to work under such restrictions and will leave to go somewhere else that suits them better. Again, not good if the best of the talent leaves the business.</p>
<p>By contrast, if you ease up security too much in the hope that users will be productive than you face the risk of more downtime and being the target of malicious attacks which will also bring systems down, possibly destroy brand image, lead to loss of sales and, at the extreme end and depending on the attack could mean the failure of the organisation.</p>
<p>So, which is the right answer; Control Freak or Freedom Fighter ? Perhaps the answer is more Business Enabler.</p>
<p><em><span style="color: #3366ff;">Me: Tell me, what are you hoping to get from this solution ?</span></em></p>
<p><em><span style="color: #3366ff;">Client: We want to <strong>help</strong> our users to do what they have to do, we need to <strong>allow</strong> them to transparently access data they should have access to and no more and <strong>let </strong>them to send it out in an appropriate manner to the <strong>correct</strong> recipients for the <strong>right</strong> uses. They <strong>should</strong> be able to get to web sites they need to and we <strong>want</strong> them to be successful.</span></em></p>
<p>If you get the balance right then the organisation can work at speed, in a connected fashion with appropriate security controls. Staff will be happy with their systems and happiness leads to better motivation and increased success. It also leads to fewer support calls, an easier life for the helpdesk and more time to do better IT leading to even more improvements.</p>
<p>Redstone have a very good white paper that you can download if you would like a more in depth explanation of this philosophy and how the security decisions you take can help make or break your organisation. Download it <a href="http://www.redstonemanaged.co.uk/assets/files/datasheets/Security%20of%20Economics.pdf">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://philipflint.com/2010/11/03/are-you-an-it-control-freak-or-a-freedom-fighter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Configuring an internal Certificate Authority for lab environments</title>
		<link>http://philipflint.com/2010/09/01/configuring-an-internal-certificate-authority-for-lab-environments/</link>
		<comments>http://philipflint.com/2010/09/01/configuring-an-internal-certificate-authority-for-lab-environments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 21:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philip Flint</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 2008 R2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philipflint.com/?p=419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes people write really excellent articles on the web. This is one of those occassions where an article needs nothing adding to it. If you set up labs to learn new technologies, study for exams or just to pre-flight technologies before you put them live and struggle to have certificates working &#8220;inside&#8221; and &#8220;outside&#8221; of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes people write really excellent articles on the web. This is one of those occassions where an article needs nothing adding to it. If you set up labs to learn new technologies, study for exams or just to pre-flight technologies before you put them live and struggle to have certificates working &#8220;inside&#8221; and &#8220;outside&#8221; of your lab based environment, the article at <a href="http://www.windowsnetworking.com/articles_tutorials/Certificate-Revocation-Checking-Test-Labs.html">http://www.windowsnetworking.com/articles_tutorials/Certificate-Revocation-Checking-Test-Labs.html</a> walks you through publishing CRL&#8217;s (to an &#8220;external&#8221; server for example) or even turning off revocation checking so that its no longer an issue (only advisable in lab environments).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://philipflint.com/2010/09/01/configuring-an-internal-certificate-authority-for-lab-environments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Audit Active Directory</title>
		<link>http://philipflint.com/2009/11/18/audit-active-directory/</link>
		<comments>http://philipflint.com/2009/11/18/audit-active-directory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philip Flint</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Active Directory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philipflint.com/?p=380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Want some free advice on what to audit in Active Directory ? You could do worse than go to http://www.activedirsec.com/index.html - try out their free Gold Finger tool too.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Want some free advice on what to audit in Active Directory ?</p>
<p>You could do worse than go to <a href="http://www.activedirsec.com/index.html">http://www.activedirsec.com/index.html</a> - try out their free Gold Finger tool too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://philipflint.com/2009/11/18/audit-active-directory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

